mvgk What if Veena Vijayan is questioned by ED, when a CM is in jail: Kerala CPI(M)
Mufi India sees 4-spot jump in median mobile speeds globally
Imphal: The Manipur High Court has ordered deletion of a paragraph from a March 2023 order that urged the state to consider including the Meitei community in the Scheduled Tribe list, saying the paragraph was in conflict with the Supreme Court constitution bench stance. The March 27, 2023 directive, believed to be a catalyst for ethnic unrest that claimed over 200 lives, was rescinded by a single judge bench of Justice Golmei Gaiphulshillu during a review petition h [url=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.us]stanley usa[/url] earing on Wednesday. The contentious paragraph from last year verdict, instructing the state to expedit [url=https://www.stanleyuk.uk]stanley cup uk[/url] e consideration of Meitei community inclusion, was deemed for deletion. The paragraph of the last year verdict stated the state governm [url=https://www.cup-stanley.com.de]stanley becher[/url] ent 8220 hall consider the case of the petitioners for inclusion of Meetei/Meitei community in the Scheduled Tribes list, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. Justice Gaiphulshillu ruling on February 21 emphasised the necessity of removing the directive, pointing to the Government of India stipulated procedure for Scheduled Tribe list amendments. Justice Gaiphulshillu said, Accordingly, the direction given at para no. 17 iii needs to be deleted and is ordered accordingly for deletion of the para no. 17 iii of the judgment and order dated March 27, 2023鈥? Referring to the constitutional protocol detailed in the Ministry of Tribal Affairs ; 2013-14 report Uoqe YS Sharmila lashes out at KCR
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has upheld the extradition of a man from Uttar Pradesh to聽Oman聽to face criminal trial on charges of murder there. Justice [url=https://www.stanley-cup.com.es]stanley termo[/url] Amit Bansal on Friday dismissed the petition by Majibullah M Haneef challenging the decision of the Centre to extradite him upon a request from the authorities in聽Oman聽after an inquiry was undertaken by a trial court here. The judge noted that India has an extradition treaty with the Sultanate of聽Oman, which states that persons accused of an offence punishable under the laws of both the countries with imprisonment for not less than one [url=https://www.stanley-de.de]stanley germany[/url] year or for more severe punishment shall be extradited. The petitioner, who was working as a labourer in Bidiyah in聽Oman, is accused of committing premeditated murder felony which is punishable under Article 302-A of the Penal Code of聽Oman. Also ReadKuwait detonates bombs dating back 1990 invasion On July 31, 2019, an聽Omani national as well as his wife and three minor children were f [url=https://www.stanleycup.com.es]botellas stanley[/url] ound dead at his home where the petitioner was engaged for whitewashing. Justice Bansal rejected the petitioner apprehension that he would not get a fair trial in聽Oman聽as it was governed by Sharia and the offence of murder was only punishable with death penalty there. The court observed that聽Oman聽has assured the Indian government that the petitioner would have a fair and just trial and he would be provided with a lawyer to defend himself and an interpreter would also be provided to h
