coio Refugees need human connection : how to help make Britain a true home for the displaced
Phou We lay like corpses. Then the raping began : 52 years on, Bangladesh s rape camp survivors speak out
Doctors may be steering older women away from certain breast cancer treatments due to well-meaning but misplaced beliefs about their preferences and fitness to undergo surgery, [url=https://www.cup-stanley.at]stanley thermobecher[/url] a study suggests.Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK, with about 56,000 people diagnosed and 11,500 dying from it each year. Although survival rates have almost doubled over the past 40 years, the greatest gains have been in younger patients. Since the 1970s there has been a 44% reduction in 65- to 69-year-olds, a 50% reduction in 50- to 64-year-olds and a 57% reduction in patients aged 25 to 49, versus a 27% [url=https://www.stanley-cup.it]stanley cup[/url] reduction in 70- to 79-year-olds and a 6% increase for those aged 80-plus.One potential reason for this survival gap is lower rates of surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy among older breast cancer patients, and a greater reliance on primary endocrine therapy PET using tamoxifen 鈥?a drug that blocks oestrogen receptors on cancer cells, inhibiting their growth 鈥?compared with younger patients. In the UK, up to 40% of older breast cancer patients are treated with PET alone, despite evidence that elective surgery in many of these patients is safe, said Prof Malcolm Reed, an expert in breast cancer management in older women at Brighton and Sussex medical school.Half of older women unclear on breast cancer symptom [url=https://www.stanleycups.at]stanley becher[/url] sRead moreConcerned that clinicians might be inadvertently steering women away from additional treatments, Reed and his colleagues asked 31 UK breast surgeons and specialis Odyq Braverman dropping Windrush measures was unlawful, court told
Last Monday, Nepal s Maoist leader Kamal Dahal, known as Prachanda , was sworn in as the first prime minister of the Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal, having won an overwhelming vote [url=https://www.cup-stanley.pl]stanley kubek[/url] in the constituent assembly elected in April. The assembly s opening action had been to vote almost unanimously to abolish the 239-year-old monarchy, and in June ex-king Gyanendra Shah departed the palace, to remain in the country as an ordinary citizen.Nepal fleetingly made headlines after the 2001 palace massacre of the previous monarch and his family: its 10-year civil war was seldom in the international limelight. So too, the country s unique peace process has rarely gained outside attention since the guns fell silent two years ag [url=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.co.uk]stanley flasks[/url] o. Yet amid too many continuing conflicts and failing peace processes, a suc [url=https://www.cups-stanley.de]stanley cup[/url] cess story deserves to be recognised and supported.I came to Nepal in mid-2005, when the human rights violations committed by both sides to the armed conflict, together with the crackdown on democratic rights as the king seized absolute power, led the international community to support a monitoring presence of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. With no end in sight to a war with thousands of civilian victims, and democracy far from the horizon, nobody could have foreseen how the people of Nepal would express their demand for peace and change. The turning point was the April 2006 people s movement, when hundreds of thousands took to the streets, for 19 succes
