zxkj Have I got mews for you: Peter Barber, the miracle creator of dazzling streets
Yxdp No plan for Covid vaccine passports in UK, says Michael Gove
The gap between what men and women earn has narrowed but persists with research suggesting men are now twice as likely to earn more than $120,000 a year than w [url=https://www.cups-stanley.ca]stanley mug[/url] omen.Data from the Workplace Gender Equality Agency released on Friday shows women typically earn about $25,000 less than men.The overall gender pay gap continued its downward trend for the 2020-21 financial year, pegged at 22.8%, meaning that for every $10 a man earned a woman made about $7.72.NSW to revisit economic gender disparity in the wake of Grace Tame and Brittany HigginsRead moreThats down by half a percentage point from the previous year, but the WGEA says it understates the true extent of the problem.The pay gap includes super, bonuses and additional payments but excludes salaries for chief [url=https://www.stanley-cup.co.nz]stanley mug[/url] executives and heads of business, 81% of whom are men.More than 60% of women are employed in part-time or casual roles and their work is converted into full-time equivalent earnings for the sake of calculations. No matter how the gender pay gap is calculated, there is a consistent gap in favour of men, the report states.The pay gap is not a measure of whether women earn less than men for the same job 鈥?that is pay equality and is a legal requirement.Rather, its is an indicator of womens overall position in the workforce, representing how they and their work are valued.While men are twice as lik [url=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de]stanley cups[/url] ely to earn more than $120,000 a year, women are substantially over-represented at the bottom level of all earners .An Austral Iuam ICC opens Central African Republic investigation
Gold-plating is the latest government term used to disparage efforts to achieve equality by public sector bodies. But hang on, isn t a gold standard something good, a form of best practice to which we should aspire [url=https://www.stanleycups.pl]stanley cup[/url] Clearly not, according to the government s response to the review, published last Friday, of the public sector equality duty PSED 鈥?which requires all public authorities to take account of how their policies and practices might have an adverse impact on disadvantaged g [url=https://www.stanleymugs.ca]stanley canada[/url] roups protected by equality legislation.To the relief of many, the review did not recommend either a repe [url=https://www.cup-stanley.it]borraccia stanley[/url] al or significant weakening of the PSED 鈥?primarily because the review panel had to conclude that it s too early to say how well the PSED is operating in practice, since it had only been in place for a year when the review began. This is precisely the point that many of us made when the government announced its intentions. We could have saved the taxpayer a fortune.What is more worrying in the review is the consistent undermining of equality best practice as burdensome, tending towards over-compliance and gold-plating . According to the equalities minister, Maria Miller, something must be done to put an end to the gold-plating of equality activity by some public authorities. The government s attitude towards equality law was made plain when it announced a review, under its red tape challenge , of the PSED.It is therefore rather surprising
