bwvr Bernie Sanders not really happy about DNC s 2016 debate schedule
Bocc McCain Stumps In Missouri Today
The Justice Department is suing to block a $2.2 billion book publishing deal that would have reshaped the industry, saying consolidation would hurt authors and, ultimately, readers.German media giant Bertelsmann s Penguin Random House, already the largest American publisher, wants to buy New York-based Simon Schuster, whose authors include Stephen King, Hillary Clinton and John Irving, from TV and film company ViacomCBS. ViacomCBS is also the parent company of CBS News. The Department of Justice filed an antitrust suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Tuesday in the first major antitrust action by the Biden administration, saying the deal would let Penguin Random House exert outsized influence over which books are published in the United States and how much authors are paid for their work. [url=https://www.stanleywebsite.us]stanley drinking cup[/url] If the world s largest book publisher is [url=https://www.stanley-quencher.co.uk]stanley cups uk[/url] permitted to acquire one of its [url=https://www.stanley-cups.de]stanley cup[/url] biggest rivals, it will have unprecedented control over this important industry. American authors and consumers will pay the price of this anticompetitive merger ndash; lower advances for authors and ultimately fewer books and less variety for consumers, said Attorney General Merrick Garland in a statement.The purchase of Simon Schuster would reduce the so-called Big Five, which dominate American publishing and include HarperCollins, Hachette Book Group and Macmillan, to four. The deal raised concerned from writers and from rival pub Obof U.S. doesn t know how Wall Street Journal reporter detained in Russia is being treated, official says
By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blogIs health insurance biased aga [url=https://www.stanley-cup.cz]stanley cup[/url] inst women because in many states women pay higher rates when they are younger The city of San Francisco is challenging state legislat [url=https://www.stanley-cup.co.nz]stanley mug[/url] ion that allows insurance companies to charge women more than men for health coverage. In a practice known as gender rating, women in California pay up to 39 percent more than men for coverage in the individual insurance market, which is where people who aren t covered by employer plans or state health programs get their insurance. Nationwide, about 7 percent of women buy their health coverage directly from insurance companies.At first blush, the answer to my question above is Of course! But continue reading the article and you ll find that bias, and cost, are reversed as people age. Insurance companies have argued that their premiums reflect the actual costs of healthcare. Because women fil [url=https://www.stanley-cups.com.es]termo stanley[/url] e more insurance claims than men, it makes sense that they should pay more for their coverage, said Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for the trade group America s Health Insurance Plans. He noted that as people get older, the gender rating process reverses, with men paying more for their insurance than women.So if older men have to pay more than older women, is that bias Or is it simply a market factor that has nothing to do with bias If elimination of all differences between the genders is what passes for bias these days, then the answer
