wlnk Will Dems Give Up on Health Care
Xldl Democrats Use Head Stomping in Ad Blasting Rand Paul
A new report released Wednesday highlighted the sweep of state legislative efforts that may threaten fair and secure election administration.This year legislatures in 33 states mdash; most of which are controlled by Republicans mdash; have introduced 244 bills that would give the partisan legislature or legislatively appointed officials more sway over election operations than civilian appointees, or create undue burdens for nonpartisan election officials. Twenty-four of those bills became law, according to the report from the States United Democracy Center and Protect Democracy, nonpartisan organizations that aim to defend democratic elections.Some of the proposed laws were introduced by prominent election deniers who will be on the ballot this November, as candidates for office as their state s top election official. Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem, who is currently running for secretary of [url=https://www.stanley-cups.de]stanley cup[/url] state, introduced one bill to decertify Arizona s 2020 election results mdash;which researchers note is not a legal option mdash; and another to require hand tabulation of ballots in all elections, a move that experts have said wou [url=https://www.stanley-cups.us]stanley cup[/url] ld make the count more error-prone, rather than less, and more vulnerable to interference. The Republican gubernatorial nominee in Pennsylvania, state Sen. Doug Mastriano, introduced legis [url=https://www.stanley1913.com.es]vaso stanley[/url] lation that would strip some nonpartisan professionals of their oversight of election administration. Victoria Bassetti, senior coun Bwvk Was N.J. Governor Wearing Seat Belt
Taking up what has become an annual abortion fight, the Senate voted Friday to lift a ban on women using personal funds to obtain an abortion at military hospital overseas.The House, however, last month rejected for a seventh straight year an attempt to end the prohibition, and the two chambers must address the issue when they meet to work out differences on a $393 billion defense bill for next year.The Senate vote was 52-40. [url=https://www.stanley-cups.ca]stanley canada[/url] Opponents said the provision allowing abortions, if left in the bill that approves defense spending programs for the [url=https://www.stanley-cups.uk]stanley cups uk[/url] fiscal year starting Oct. 1, could effectively prevent it from clearing Congress and going to the president for his signature.But supporters, led by Sens. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Patty Murray, D-Wash., argued that it was unfair that women serving their country overseas were denied the rights to a safe and legal abortion available to women at home. It is ironic, said Snowe, that women who are on the front line and defending us in this war on terrorism ... are [url=https://www.stanley-cups.ca]stanley mug[/url] least protected in terms of the right to make choices. The House last month rejected a similar amendment to the defense bill for a seventh straight year, by a generally party-line 215-202 vote. The last Senate vote, in 2000, was 50-49 against lifting the ban.Opponents argued that taxpayer-funded military facilities shouldn t be used for abortions, even those that are privately paid for. It s very harmful, wrong, that we would hold Ame
