kfdh Diversity of criminal bar at risk as junior barristers forced to quit
Kjsn Managers at G4S-run Medway youth jail paid bonuses despite failings
A new authority set up to properly compensate the victims and families of the infected blood scandal is due to start making payments by the end of this year.The Infected Blood Compensation Authority IBCA was set up after the inquiry in May into the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHS concluded that governments, the health service and doctors had repeatedly failed victims. R [url=https://www.stanley-cups.de]stanley cup[/url] egulations enacting the compensation scheme were laid out on Friday.Jason Evans, founder of the Factor 8 campaign group, whose father Jonathan died in October 1993 after contracting HIV and hepatitis C from contaminated blood, described the scheme as a massive step forward .Evans [url=https://www.stanley-cups.fr]stanley cup[/url] said: No amount of compensation will ever replace th [url=https://www.cup-stanley.es]stanley spain[/url] ose who died, but this scheme seems fair overall. He said the key aims of campaigners had been to secure a public inquiry and for a fair compensation scheme to be established. He added: There can never be a resolution to a scandal like this, but I feel weve achieved what we set out to do. About 3,000 people died and 30,000 were infected with HIV, hepatitis or both after being given contaminated blood transfusions and products in the 1970s-80s. Many of the deaths were caused by commercial blood products being given to haemophilia sufferers to replace a clotting protein called factor VIII.While schemes have previously been set up to provide support, many of those affected have received limited compensation or none at all. It has been estimated that the new schem Rvee Home Office doomed to repeat the mistakes of Windrush
One of the UKs longest running legal battles has been resolved after more than 70 years, enabling descendants of an Indian princely family to collect 拢35m from NatWest bank.The dispute dates back to 1948 and tumultuous events following Indias independence, when the last Nizam of Hyderabad transferred 拢 1m into the account of Pakistans high commissioner in London.The monarchs family was Muslim and had resisted his states incorporation into Hindu-dominated India. Over seven decades, the de [url=https://www.cups-stanley.de]stanley cup[/url] posit has accumulated interest and is worth around 拢35m.Pakistan claimed the money was payment for weapons that would have been used to defend Hyderabad against the Indian army. The family of Nizam VII maintained that the cash had merely been lodged abroad for safekeeping.The case first arrived in the chancery division of the high court in London as long ago as 1954 when the [url=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.pl]kubki stanley[/url] Hyderabad royals challenged the bank and the Pakistan commissioner for the return of the money.With its echoes of the Jarndyce v Jarndyce saga in Charles Dickens Bleak House, the claim reached the House of Lords in 1957 where Pakistan successfully asserted sovereign immunity. Legal proceedings were then effectively frozen for the next 60 years.In 2013, Pa [url=https://www.cups-stanley.uk]stanley bottle[/url] kistan decided to waive its right to sovereign immunity and launched legal action to claim the cash from NatWest. Their action triggered rival claims by the two grandsons of Nizam VII.In a 140-page ruling handed down on Wednesday, the high court in London declared that: N
