nfab Chief justice notes Kavanaugh case, cites dangers of political pressure
Fryv Biden to tap Katherine Tai for U.S. trade representative and Denis McDonough to head veterans affairs
Wisconsin s conservative-controlled Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a hospital could not be forced to give a deworming drug to a patient with COVID-19, saying a county judge did not cite a legal basis for ordering the facility to administer ivermectin.Ivermectin became popular among conservatives after commentators and even some far-right doctors held up the antiparasitic drug as a miracle cure for the coronavirus and ot [url=https://www.stanley-cup.fr]stanley cup[/url] her illnesses. But the Food and Drug Administration has [url=https://www.cup-stanley.es]stanley taza[/url] not approved it for use in treating COVID-19 and warns that misusing ivermectin can be harmful, even fatal.The Wisconsin lawsuit is one of dozens filed across the country seeking to force hospitals to administer ivermectin for COVID-19. The drug is commonly used in cattle and also approved for human use to fight parasites and certain skin conditions. But some members of online alternative medicine groups have reported self-administering highly concentrated, veterinary-grade ivermectin to treat illnesses. The FDA warns that self-administering the drug, [url=https://www.stanley-cups.uk]stanley mug[/url] especially in doses intended for animals, can be lethal. In Tuesday s ruling, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 6-1 in favor of Aurora Health Care, with three liberals and three conservatives in support and only conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley dissenting.The decision upholds an appeal court s ruling against Allen Gahl, who sued Aurora in October 2021 when doctors refused to treat his uncle, John Zingsheim, with iv Uoam Moving Time
Former House Spe [url=https://www.stanley-quencher.us]stanley mugs[/url] aker Newt Gingrich on Face the Nation, Sunday, May 22, 2011. CBS News/Chris Usher Newt Gingrich on Wednesday denied that he and his wife were granted special treatment by Tiffany Co. in acquiring a line of credit with the company [url=https://www.stanley-cups.at]stanley thermosflasche[/url] . The denial comes in the wake of the revelation that the congressional committee at which his wife worked when the loan was extended was being heavily lobbied by the [url=https://www.stanleycup.com.se]stanley cup[/url] prominent jewelry company. Gingrich took heat last week when it was revealed that he and his wife had between 2005 and 2006 incurred from $250,001 and $500,000 of debt with Tiffany Co. In an appearance on CBS Face the Nation Sunday, Gingrich insisted that he and his wife had held a standard, no-interest account with the company and that it s a normal way of doing business. We re private citizens, Gingrich told host Bob Schieffer when asked about the expenses. I work very hard. We have a reasonably good income. I currently owe nothing, except I owe one mortgage on a house that s rental property in Wisconsin. Everything else is totally paid for. My home is paid for. My cars are paid for. We don t have a second house. We don t do elaborate things. On Wednesday, the blog Spy Talk noted that the House Agriculture Committee, on which Gingrich s wife Callista was at the time servin
