lcvb Several Gay Couples In California Say Vows Before Election Day
Snit Clinton Says Obama Needs to Explain Inconsistency in Gun Views
Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is accusing her Democratic presidential primary opponent Sen. Kamala Harris of staging a political ploy to smear former Vice President Joe Biden s reputation and his record on civil rights.In an interview on CBSN s Red Blue that streamed Monday, Gabbard said Harris has been leveling this accusation that Joe Biden is a racist mdash; when he s clearly not mdash; as a way to try to smear him. She tweeted a similar sen [url=https://www.stanley-cups.de]stanley cup[/url] timent earlier in the day.Biden, the early front-runner in [url=https://www.stanley-cups.us]stanley cup website[/url] the crowded Democratic primary, has been facing withering criticism from fellow Democrats over his comments about working with segregationist lawmakers, most pointedly by Harris, a woman of color, duringthe first Democratic debatein Miami late last month. Harris never accused Biden of racial animus, and specifically said I do not believe you are a racist before confronting him on stag [url=https://www.stanley-cup.pl]stanley cups[/url] e at the debate. Her stinging rebuke of the former vice president on the issue mdash; and his indignant defense mdash; nevertheless became the standout moment of the night.A spokesman for Harris could not immediately be reached for comment on Monday. Harris noted Biden opposed federal measures to ensure that local jurisdictions used busing to desegregate public schools during the 1970s, saying the position was personally painful for her. Biden pushed back on her criticism by stating he opposed busing ordered by the Department of Education. Gvll Saudi Arabia cutting oil output in move that could raise gas prices
SISTANI S FATWAS....Via Robert F [url=https://www.stanley-cups.fr]stanley cup[/url] arley and a bunch of other people, Hamza Hendawi and Qassim Abdul-Zahra of AP report that Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the most influential cleric in Iraq, may be moving in a worrisome direction:Iraq s most influential Shiite cleric has been quietly issuing religious edicts declaring that armed resistance against U.S.-led foreign troops is permissible mdash; a potentially significant shift by a key supporter of the Washington-backed government in Baghdad.....So [url=https://www.stanley-cups.ca]stanley mug[/url] far, al-Sistani s fatwas have been limited to a handful of people. They also were issued verbally and in private mdash; rather than a blanket proclamation to the general Shiite population mdash; according to three prominent Shiite officials in regular contact with al-Sistani....Between 10 and 15 people are believed to have received the new fatwas in recent months, the Shiite officials told the AP.....It is impossible to determine whether those who received the edicts acted on them. Most attacks mdash; except some by al-Qaida in Iraq mdash; are carried out without claims of responsibility.All the usual caveats apply here. The purpose of the fatwas is murky, the leakers may have axes to [url=https://www.cup-stanley.com.de]stanley kaffeebecher[/url] grind we don t know about, and it s a good idea not to overreact to daily news from Iraq.That said, this ranks fairly high on the worry meter. As badly as the U.S. occupation of Iraq has gone, it would have gone way, way worse if Sistani hadn t cooperated with us. And for the most part he has, mo
